File #: 23-107    Version: 2 Name:
Type: Agendas Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/24/2023 In control: Town Council
On agenda: 4/4/2023 Final action:
Title: Adoption of a Facilities Naming Policy PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to request that the Town Council adopt an official naming policy for town-owned facilities and rooms.
Attachments: 1. Attachment A- Comparison of CH and OC naming policy, 2. Attachment B- Chapel Hill and Orange County Naming Policy Comparisons, 3. Attachment C- Naming Policy Racial Equity Pocket Questions

Title

Adoption of a Facilities Naming Policy

 

PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to request that the Town Council adopt an official naming policy for town-owned facilities and rooms.

end

Department

DEPARTMENT: Town Manager’s Office

end

Contact

CONTACT INFORMATION: Zack Kier, Assistant to the Town Manager, 919-918-7307, zkier@carrboronc.gov

end

Council Direction

COUNCIL DIRECTION:

___ Race/Equity   ____ Climate   ____ Comprehensive Plan __X__Other

Council Direction Statement

This proposed policy will help guide the naming of new and existing town-owned facilities.

end

Information

INFORMATION: The construction of the 203 Project has provided an opportunity to consider naming the building and rooms in conjunction with Orange County. Orange County has an adopted facilities naming policy. The Town of Carrboro does not have a similar policy.  The creation of an official naming policy will guide this process.

Many local governments have adopted policies that guide them on how to name facilities and buildings. These policies ensure fairness and equity and ensures that a uniform process is applied to all naming conventions. Other municipalities in Orange County have adopted naming policies for their facilities and rooms. Attachment A compares Orange County and Chapel Hill’s naming policies. Attachment B lists Orange County’s naming policies and features Chapel Hill’s differences in red. Attachment C features the racial equity pocket questions.  Overall, the policies are generally similar with some exceptions. Chapel Hill’s policy is more formal and streamlined with a standing naming committee that makes recommendations to the Council. They also have more stringent restrictions on what type of businesses can sponsor rooms or sporting facilities. Orange County Board of Commissioners have more direct control by not having a committee and addressing the naming of facilities on a case-by-case basis.

end

 

 

Fiscal and Staff Impact

FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal and staff impacts depend on what the Town Council decides regarding the process for naming facilities and rooms.

end

Recommendation

RECOMMENDATION: The Town Manager recommends that that the Town Council adopts a naming policy and requests that the Orange County Board of Commissioners establish a joint naming committee for the 203 Project.

 

end